Research

Updated October 12, 2026

From plumes to people

My research asks where atmospheric models diverge from observations and what those differences reveal about wildfire emissions and smoke chemistry. I combine aircraft and surface measurements, chemical-mechanism development, and atmospheric modeling to investigate fresh and aged smoke.

My satellite work extends these questions across fires, regions, and atmospheric conditions. By combining satellite and surface observations, I test how broadly our understanding of smoke chemistry in individual plumes explains regional smoke–ozone relationships.

Schematic linking satellite, aircraft, and surface observations with atmospheric models to trace wildfire smoke from emissions to community exposure. — Observations and models connect wildfire emissions to the air people breathe. Open the full-size schematic. Tap the figure to enlarge it.

1. How much do western U.S. wildfires emit?

I study both the amount of gases released by wildfires and the chemical diversity of those emissions. I combine aircraft observations of fresh plumes, satellite-derived fire inventories, ground measurements of aged smoke, and GEOS-Chem sensitivity simulations to examine these questions.

In our western U.S. tests, three fire inventories generally detected the large fires sampled by aircraft, yet simulated fire-related increases in carbon monoxide (CO) and several directly emitted volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were only about one-third to one-seventh as large as observed. Finding the fires was not enough to quantify the gases they released.

The biomass-burning VOCs represented in GEOS-Chem accounted for only about half of the total VOC-to-CO emission ratio measured across 161 compounds. After accounting for both gaps, we estimated that wildfires supplied about 45% of western U.S. primary VOC emissions during the active 2018 fire season.

Increasing emissions alone does not fix every pollutant. In a separate aged-smoke test, tripling modeled biomass-burning VOC and CO emissions improved several gases but could not correct gases and PM₂.₅ at the same time. These results connect the emissions question to how the mixture changes as smoke ages.

Related publications. Jin et al., 2023, ACP (paper) · Jin et al., 2026, ACP (paper)

2. How does smoke chemistry evolve?

I combine aircraft and ground observations with chemical-age diagnostics, chemical box models, and three-dimensional models to follow VOC loss and the formation of ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN). Chemical clocks help estimate how much oxidation the smoke has experienced.

Smoke can react at very different rates from one fire to another. Across five selected daytime plumes, chemical age explained 40–70% of the between-plume variation in VOC loss and ozone and PAN formation. At least two plumes began under VOC-limited or transitional conditions and moved toward NOₓ-limited conditions as they aged.

In a separate Missoula aged-smoke case, GEOS-Chem OH exposure was about twice the value inferred from ground-based chemical clocks, and the model underestimated several oxygenated VOCs. These comparisons test whether models capture both the initial wildfire VOC mixture and its evolution downwind.

My current work combines satellite and surface observations with trajectory analysis to investigate when smoke is associated with changes in regional ozone and where plume-scale understanding may need refinement.

Related publications. Jin et al., 2026, Science Advances (paper) · Jin et al., 2026, ACP (paper)

3. How do reactive wildfire VOCs shape smoke chemistry?

The chemical composition of smoke matters for how it evolves. Aircraft-constrained modeling identifies furanoids—together with acrolein and 1,3-butadiene—as important contributors to VOC reactivity that are omitted or simplified in reduced chemical mechanisms. At the sampled plume centers, a detailed gas-phase mechanism reproduced much of the inferred OH and observed ozone behavior when supplied with a fuller VOC mixture.

My ongoing work examines how furanoid oxidation affects oxygenated VOCs, glyoxal, and secondary organic aerosol from plume to global scales. I combine laboratory-derived aerosol yields, explicit chemical-mechanism development, aircraft constraints, and global chemical transport modeling.

Published foundation. Jin et al., 2026, Science Advances (paper) · Permar et al., 2023, Environmental Science: Atmospheres

Project outputs. AGU 2024 abstract · IGC11 slides · Furanoid mechanism manuscript in preparation

4. What did multi-day smoke bring to Missoula?

I study what reaches communities after smoke has traveled and reacted for several days. During September 2020, much of the regional smoke reaching Missoula had undergone this aging, although smaller nearby fires may also have contributed. During smoke periods, CO, fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅), and measured VOCs were 2–8 times their background levels.

I combined long-term air-quality records, hourly measurements of 75 VOCs, chemical transport modeling, and toxicity-based exposure metrics to examine what this smoke brought to the city. In an upper-bound screening scenario that assumed a person experienced a 2020-like smoke season every year for 70 years, PM₂.₅ accounted for about 90% of the estimated cancer risk. Measured hazardous gases dominated the chronic noncancer risk estimate.

These are screening estimates, not measurements of illness. They show why assessing particles and gases together gives a fuller picture of wildfire-smoke exposure.

Related publication. Jin et al., 2026, ACP (paper)

If you are interested in collaboration on wildfire emissions, smoke chemistry, satellite integration, atmospheric modeling, or exposure and health applications, please use my contact page.